Category: Uncategorized

  • Trade Union Congress Wages not Weapons motion is a very  welcome development.

    Trade Union Congress Wages not Weapons motion is a very  welcome development.

    The September 2025 Trade Union Congress passed a motion called Wages not Weapons. This motion reversed the decision of  a motion passed  a few years ago supporting increases in defence spending. This is a very welcome development.

    In June 2025 NATO called on all of its member states to increase its defence expenditure as a percentage of GDP to 5% by 2030. This would mean massive cuts in public expenditure in countries like Britain.

    Billions for War

    NATO has become a very war monger organisation in recent years. Adopting a very hostile attitude to both Russia and China. This started after the fascist coup in Ukraine in February 2014 when the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovich who favoured a neutral Ukraine was overthrown.

    Besides welcoming  the  passing of the Trade Union Congress Wages not Weapons motion which is a vote for peace. We should also fight for a Socialist Britain and a Socialist World based on peace,justice and equality.

    Kevin O’Connor
    SLP Member, London

    2
  • Declassified UK show how journalism ought to be done in the UK

    Declassified UK show how journalism ought to be done in the UK

    In these days of supplicant and compliant MSM journalism, it was a breath of fresh air watching the independant media organisation, Declassified UK, demonstrate what proper journalism should look like, here in the UK.

    Somehow, they managed to enter Downing Street and be present for the arrival of Isaac Herzog’s motorcade. This president, is the same Isaac Herzog, who had an arrest warrant issued against him in 2024 by the International Criminal Court for plausable crimes against humanity, committed against the Palestinians in Gaza.

    Herzog was asked directly in front of Starmer, whether he was a war criminal. Starmer was asked, “Why are you shaking hands with a man who said there are no innocents in Gaza?”


    Starmer simply takes the blood-stained hand and turns his back.

    There you have it, Starmer’s government feting murderers and genocidaires in plain sight, openly and unashamedly complicit in genocide.
    Watch the video and watch the squirming.

    By Allistair Lomax

    1
  • The Wretched Antics of Peter Mandelson

    The Wretched Antics of Peter Mandelson

    As the news about the wretched antics of Peter Mandelson hitting the headlines my memories flood back to the 2001 General Election when #ArthurScargill stood for the Socialist Labour Party GB against the aptly named #PrinceOfDarkness Mandelson in the safe Labour seat of Hartlepool and I stood in the adjacent constituency of the safe Labour seat of Redcar (former seat of Mo Mowlam)

    Sadly, absolutely nothing has changed with the absolutely despicable Mandelson.

    By Johnnie Taylor

    3
  • One member’s view on the relationship between ‘Your Party’ and the Socialist Labour Party

    One member’s view on the relationship between ‘Your Party’ and the Socialist Labour Party

    Any discussion on the SLP relationship to ‘Your Party’ is in my opinion far too premature at this moment in time as we have no clue as to who they are or what they even represent, which therefore makes it impossible to make any reasoned decisions, but may I make the following observations on any ‘new left party’ that comes into existence?

    Any ‘new left party’ may want to consider some of the pitfalls of building any ‘left alliances’.

    By allowing any new party to become a “broad church” as some would seem to suggest could and would happen in this case, as history proves, embraces sections which are not committed to a fundamental change in the nature of our society. The term “broad church” was introduced to assist the right-wing, not the Left.

    This, therefore, is in my opinion the main problem of why alliances of the left will always fail, and why the SLP should not even consider any alliances, but most importantly for me is the principle of being committed to the eradication of capitalism and the establishment of socialism and common ownership as Clause IV (4) in the Socialist Labour Party GB Constitution clearly states, a principle that we as a party will and cannot move on

    The aim of common ownership as set out in Clause IV is designed to clearly commit our Party to a strategy for achieving socialism, that surely is what all of us as socialists should agree to isn’t it comrades?

    Johnnie Taylor
    SLP London Region

    5
  • Thinking of standing as a candidate for the SLP?

    Thinking of standing as a candidate for the SLP?

    Dear Comrades,

    The Socialist Labour Party is hoping to stand as many candidates as possible in the elections in Scotland,Wales and England next year (2026).

    If you would like to be considered as a candidate, could you let me know, please, so we can try to coordinate the campaigns.

    As a candidate your views must align with the SLP constitution and position, as outlined in the party’s Manifesto.

    And, of course, you must be a fully paid-up member of the party.

    If you wish to be considered, please give me your name, region and contact details so that we can all work together.

    Please contact me on christopherbutler1@mac.com.

    The Socialist Labour Party has a lot to offer to achieve a just, socialist alternative to the disaster the other parties are making.

    Solidarity,

    Chris Butler,

    Elections Nomination Officer, Socialist Labour Party

    3
  • Bloody Hypocrites!

    Bloody Hypocrites!

    We are witnessing one of the most blatant hypocritical propaganda campaigns on an international scale since the Nazi German fascist campaign in the 1930s.

    We are witnessing NATO, the European Union, the United States of America and individual countries, including the United Kingdom condemning Russia for its conflict with Ukraine and pouring billions of dollars, euros and pounds sterling into Ukraine on the grounds it is a crime to occupy the whole or part of another country.

    Yet Nato, the European Union, the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom are all bloody hypocrites as the following shows:

    Nato and the EU supported the overthrow of democratically elected governments in Yugoslavia, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, all instigated by the United States

    The United States have occupied part of Cuba (Guantanamo Bay) and supported the overthrow of governments throughout the Middle East, above all, these bodies have supported the fascist State of Israel since 1948 in its policy of occupation of land in 1967 and its occupation of Palestinian land and slaughter of Palestinians, including Gaza the West Bank, the Golan Heights, Lebanon. As well as supporting Taiwan (which is recognised as part of China).

    To date the British Government has expended over £125 billion in arms and aid to the fascist government of the Ukraine which
    gained power as a result of the overthrow of both an elected president and an elected government.


    If it is right for the West to support a fascist Ukraine then it’s right to remember it was Ukraine troops who fought with Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union and were guards at concentration camps which were liberated by the Red Army who also liberated the Ukraine, Czechoslovaia and Berlin.


    If the Western Powers can openly support Israel and to their shame provide it with arms then they cannot justify the very opposite in their attack on Russia when it was Ukraine who breached the agreement concluded at Minsk

    Arthur Scargill
    President NUM 1982-2002

    7
  • The Welsh Senedd/Assembly Election 2026 Matters.

    The Welsh Senedd/Assembly Election 2026 Matters.

    The Welsh Senedd’s composition is now Labour, 30 seats, Conservative, 14 seats, Plaid Cymru, 12 seats, Independents, 2 seats, Liberal Democrats, 1 seat and Reform UK, 1 seat.

    There are 60 elected members known as AS members. There will be 96 members after the May election next year. They will represent 16 areas, each comprising of 6 AS seats.

    Each one represents people in an area of 2 Parliamentary Constituency boundaries.

    The First Minister is Eluned Morgan.

    The majority of seats held are by parties who have cut welfare at Westminster, from the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats of 2010 onwards, to the Labour Government of 2024

    The Socialist Labour Party has campaigned on Welfare not Warfare, and so can pressure Westminster on its continuing military spending on the Ukraine War.

    It is relevant to Wales because as long as spending on war is protected it cannot be an area of spending redirected to funding for Wales.

    Plaid Cymru have the aim of Independence for Wales, until there is a referendum Yes vote victory, the Senedd has limited powers. These have been extended by voting to include;

    • Raising Finance
    • The NHS
    • Education
    • Housing
    • Welsh Language and Culture
    • Local Government

    There is an estimated £27 billion a year funding from Westminster for Wales. Compare this to an estimated £205 billion for new Trident nuclear weapons and submarines. There is austerity in lack of services and welfare cuts in Wales.

    There is a need for socialist policy to stop the draining of money through private outsourcing in the NHS and other essential services. Wales doesn’t have enough NHS resources or capacity for a population of 3,187,000 people. It needs a yearly NHS budget to build long term capacity, without being drained by the private sector. 1-in-4 people are estimated to be on waiting lists.

    This spring, the BBC said;“Twelve times more mental health patients are waiting more than 18 months for treatment than those with physical health conditions “.

    The pressure is to go private, while the majority wait. Dentistry is almost all privatised.

    Covid has left long term health conditions, there are no services to turn to for help. From GP Surgeries to A&E waiting, resources are overstretched.

    If you live in Wales and would support the Socialist Labour Party, you can contact me on 07774 136728, or email kathrinejones01@btinternet.com.

    By Kathrine Jones, SLP, Wales.

    4
  • Israel tries to tighten its grip on UK Media, leaked briefing reveals.

    Israel tries to tighten its grip on UK Media, leaked briefing reveals.

    It is being reported on social media, and consequently ignored by the main stream media, that a civil servant has leaked a set of briefing notes prepared for the Culture Secretary, Lisa Nandy, for her meeting today (8-7-2025) with the Israeli Ambassador, Tzipi Hotovely, in which it is claimed that Nandy will tell Hotovely that the BBC is “institutionally antisemitic” and that “one mistake is an editing error but if you have multiple mistakes you need to look at the leadership”.

    And it is further claimed that Nandy will also inform Hotovely that “Glastonbury continues to host acts with vile and inflammatory views”, and that further investigation is required.

    This statement flies in the face of the many instances of criticism from external sources over the pro-Israeli bias in the BBC’s coverage of the genocide in Gaza, (which term ‘genocide’ it doggedly refuses to use). Criticism from inside the BBC came from a recent letter drafted by 100 BBC employees to director Tim Davie that accuses the BBC of bias against the Palestinian cause and said:
    All too often it has felt that the BBC has been performing PR for the Israeli government and military. This should be a cause of great shame and concern for everyone at the BBC…”

    If this leaked briefing turns out to be true, this has profound and disturbing implications for democracy in the UK. The government is being told to spin a false narrative to its own people, at the behest of the genocidal State of Israel, and forcing the state broadcaster to do the same, in an attempt to suppress dissent.

    What is truly shocking, is the extent to which a foreign power, a colonialist, oppressive power, has penetrated the workings of the UK government, to attempt to tighten its grip on our media, in order to silence the voices of opposition to Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people.


    We are literally being forced by a Labour government to ‘reject the evidence of your eyes and ears’ in true Orwellian fashion.

    We must resist it at all cost, keep control of the narrative and ensure that the truth is heard.

    Allistair Lomax

    3
  • Socialist Labour Party was founded in 1996 using the name which James Connolly used in establishing the Socialist Labour Party in 1903.

    Socialist Labour Party was founded in 1996 using the name which James Connolly used in establishing the Socialist Labour Party in 1903.

    Tony Benn, Jeremy Corbyn and Arthur Scargill warned the removal of Clause IV of the Labour Party’s constitution would be a disaster for the Labour Party which had been established in 1918 by Trade Unions and socialist parties primarily because it was based on a socialist policy which pledged to secure for all workers by hand and brain, the full fruits of their labour through the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.

    Following the removal of Clause IV in 1995, we witnessed the disintegration of a socialist party and the introduction of privatisation of Britain’s nationalised industries, such as its railway system, car industry, aircraft industry and coal mining industry, education, and its National Health Service, with its replacement of trusts which have allowed the outsourcing of vital areas of care, particularly for the disabled and aged.


    Following the Referendum in 2016 the Labour Party – no longer socialist – voted with Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Green Party to stay in the European Union, whilst the Socialist Labour Party campaigned strongly to leave the European Union, particularly as people were making clear that they wanted to leave the EU, which was effectively determining the policies of the United Kingdom.


    The Chairman of the Labour Party offered to resign because he knew the feelings, particularly in the North of England and regarded that as the will of the people.


    In the General Election in 2017 the Labour Party published a manifesto which could have been written as a plan for business, despite the fact that many Labour Party members were telling the leadership, that they should accept the result of the Referendum in full, which if it had been accepted would have won the election.


    The manifesto published by the Labour Party was a policy calling for a reversal of the 2016 Manifesto which called for a new Brexit referendum, a new customs union, and a new single market. This policy was warned by the deputy leader Tom Watson, who said, “Ambiguity” over the party’s Brexit Policy had cost it votes at the European election in May.

    Jeremy Corbyn said that Labour will negotiate a Brexit deal which will allow Britain to remain in a customs union and keep an alignment to the Single Market and Labour’s shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said remaking would the best thing for the UK – He said after the election that the “catastrophic election defeat is on me” an admission which is true.


    When Jeremy Corbyn announced his resignation as leader in April 2020, I urged him not to do so and remember how many members had supported him and if he had to face an election, within the party for leader, the mass who supported him, would do so again, on the other hand, if he was so dissatisfied he should consider joining the Socialist Labour Party, whose constitution contains all the beliefs he and Tony Benn had always advocated.


    If in 2025 he is considering establishing a new political party, it would be another disaster, on the other hand, if he intends to leave the Labour Party, then we invite him to become a member of the Socialist Labour Party, which was first launched in 1903 by the legendary James Connolly.

    Arthur Scargill

    Jim McDaid

    John Tyrrell

    9
  • Welfare not Warfare! By Kathrine Jones

    Welfare not Warfare! By Kathrine Jones

    Of the 336 MPs who voted for the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill,  333 were Labour MPs, only 49 Labour MPs voted against.

    The Bill passed, subject to review. It has only been delayed in its full implementation. It should never have been voted for on any terms by the majority of Labour MPs. It will create a two-tier system; existing claimants getting access to PIP, but future claimants being denied.

    This is a huge cut, similar to the 2017 cut of Child Tax Credit being limited to two children for each family. The health element of Universal Credit looks like being cut much soon.

    People under 22 years of age were being focused on to be cut from this. Even before this Bill was passed welfare budget cuts were passed by Conservative governments from 2010.

    The new Labour government continued the roll out of Universal Credit, which was always a cut of benefits. It abolishes separate benefits by phasing them out. Disabled people, of working age, depend on PIP as essential support. PIP is the gateway for getting more income under Universal Credit, as Pension Credit is for pensioners. Using one gateway to access essential support acts as a deliberate cut.

    Many single State pensioners are caught by a rise of £s a week, it goes over the limit for Pension Credit; thousands of £s a year is lost to them. Couple State pensioners can not only lose Pension Credit, but Housing benefit and Council Tax Exemption too.

    Before this Bill there was hardship, sometimes resulting in deaths. NATO expansion and the proxy war in Ukraine caused high energy bills.

    At the recent NATO meeting Keir Starmer promised 5% of GDP on Defence by 2035. Twelve new F35 nuclear capable planes were bought from the USA, costing £1 billion. Hundreds of Storm Shadow long range Missiles have been sent to Ukraine, costing £2 million each. The new Trident nuclear weapons and Submarines will cost an estimated £205 billion.

    We can afford welfare not warfare.

    Welfare is being cut to finance the warfare.

    The Socialist Labour Party has been campaigning for a peaceful future since before this century.

    Join us!

    Kathrine Jones, Vice President, Socialist Labour Party.

    6